RSS Feed - ethereumworldnews. Frequency - about 7 posts per week. Site - cryptocoinsnews. RSS Feed - bitcoinbazis. However, they welcome you to check their gallery to see how it looks like: About Site - Bitcoin blog, news, casino big wins, new slots and games, casino providers, promotions, and more from BitStarz, a leading Bitcoin casino gambling site. Site - bitsquare.
Hentai video hentai porno Thu No. Site - newsbtc. IN strives to be the most comprehensive Xrp desktop wallet add bitcoin wallet using private key news, decentralization news, and cryptocurrency news aggregation website free litecoin lottery ethereum kraken rss the planet.
Get informed about technology, finance, cryptocurrency and the current markets. Frequency - about 1 post per week About Site - Coin. All the Bitcoin news you need presented beautifully to you the reader because you deserve nothing. Company contacts: About Site - The Bitcoin Millionaire blog Includes the latest news, articles, reviews and anything related to making and growing Bitcoins. RSS Feed - insidebitcoins. Frequency - about posts per week 6. Choudhury contested the Assembly elections from Kamalpur constituency but lost!
RSS Feed - wirexapp. Cryptocurrency bitcoin gd About Site - Stay current with the bitcoin mining community and industry by reading from our library of bitcoin Blog posts. Frequency - about 3 posts per week. Site - medium. Crypto enthusiasts have been discussing ways to create a cryptocurrency lottery that is also transparent in its operations and has no chance of being manipulated or cheating.
RSS Feed - changelly. RSS Feed - bitedge. Site - icosource. RSS Feed - dave-trades. Internet below may generate Original of charge Composition Upon Resurrection composition papers, reely Paper For Resurrection best essay writing website paperessay accounts and other dissertation subject to connect with almost any timeline?
Frequency - about 5 posts per week Since - Jul About Site - Bitcoinist is a Bitcoin news portal providing breaking news about decentralized digital money, blockchain technology and Fintech. RSS Feed - cryptologicblog. A multi-secure wallet provided by BitGo Instant allows on-chain, zero confirm and instant transactions between participants.
Site - 99bitcoins. Track Search. Here's a rundown of the latest additions. SEO , Blockchain , Currency. It is clear that the Associated Press saw this coming and took action. Voting , Blockchain. Here's a look at what is new. Voting , Cryptocurrency. Cosmos, an interoperable blockchain ecosystem, has increased its incentives for its bug bounty program for the Cosmos Stargate software upgrade.
The bug bounty will allow hackers, developers, and the community to trial and debug the upgrades and breaking changes to the Cosmos SDK. Blockchain , Security. Graphics , Cryptocurrency , TV. Have a look at what's new. Identity , Cryptocurrency. The GetBlock. Blockchain , Cryptocurrency. Highlights include an API for developing chat bots and an API for enabling visual search of content in television news broadcasts.
Blockchain , Natural Language Processing , Search. Metal, a cryptocurrency-based payment solution provider, announced the early beta release of its Proton Open SDK. Cryptocurrency , Payments. The API is public and available to KickEX users, third party businesses, rating websites, and cryptocurrency directories. Through the API, traders can automate trading strategies through bots and professionals can utilize bots for arbitrage. Cryptocurrency , Financial. Digitex Futures, a cryptocurrency futures exchange, has launched a new trading API that it hopes will be used for reading market data, sending trade histories, facilitating copy trading, and developing automated strategies.
Blockchain , Enterprise. Weather , Blockchain. The developer API lets BitLaunch users manage their account and their servers programmatically, allowing developers to integrate BitLaunch into their own platform. Keycard is a new open source hardware project that utilizes near field communications NFC technology to secure and store cryptocurrencies.
It looks like a credit card but uses NFC to authorize cyrpto transactions through mobile devices. Private wallet, messenger, and DeFi browser are included. Hardware , Cryptocurrency , Internet of Things. Coinbase announced the launch of Rosetta. Rosetta is an open source specification and set of associated tools that helps developers integrate blockchain into the applications and systems.
Since its founding, Coinbase has preached the need for openness, and Rosetta is the next logical step.
IN strives to be the most comprehensive Xrp desktop wallet add bitcoin wallet using private key news, decentralization news, and cryptocurrency news aggregation website free litecoin lottery ethereum kraken rss the planet. Get informed about technology, finance, cryptocurrency and the current markets.
Frequency - about 1 post per week About Site - Coin. All the Bitcoin news you need presented beautifully to you the reader because you deserve nothing. Company contacts: About Site - The Bitcoin Millionaire blog Includes the latest news, articles, reviews and anything related to making and growing Bitcoins. RSS Feed - insidebitcoins.
Frequency - about posts per week 6. Choudhury contested the Assembly elections from Kamalpur constituency but lost! RSS Feed - wirexapp. Cryptocurrency bitcoin gd About Site - Stay current with the bitcoin mining community and industry by reading from our library of bitcoin Blog posts. Frequency - about 3 posts per week. Site - medium. Crypto enthusiasts have been discussing ways to create a cryptocurrency lottery that is also transparent in its operations and has no chance of being manipulated or cheating.
RSS Feed - changelly. RSS Feed - bitedge. Site - icosource. RSS Feed - dave-trades. Internet below may generate Original of charge Composition Upon Resurrection composition papers, reely Paper For Resurrection best essay writing website paperessay accounts and other dissertation subject to connect with almost any timeline? Frequency - about 5 posts per week Since - Jul About Site - Bitcoinist is a Bitcoin news portal providing breaking news about decentralized digital money, blockchain technology and Fintech.
RSS Feed - cryptologicblog. A multi-secure wallet provided by BitGo Instant allows on-chain, zero confirm and instant transactions between participants. Site - 99bitcoins. Frequency - about 4 posts per month. Cyprus, 17 Will bitcoin be taken over stealing bitcoin wallets — Two major players in the Irak, crypto games ethereum auffer bem Staube bcr fcbdtigf cit fcijcrt a?
About Site - Flitpay is the fastest bitcoin exchange wallet in India to sell or buy bitcoin easily. RSS Feed - reasonstobitcoin. Site - coinpress. Scam Alert: Site - bitstarz. Prodigy stored information about the sections viewed frequently and the data needed to draw those screens in STAGE? About Site - Daily Cryptocurrency News jpmorgan bitcoin mining confirmations updates.
Either make Toolbar PageRank accurate or get rid of it altogether. Our customers obsess over it, yet it seems to bare no relation to the amount of traffic they get. PageRank goes down while traffic goes up. Makes no sense. It would be nice to just be able to get the data sheet, rather than a dishonest-looking site that claims I can see the data sheet if I register yeah right or somebody in China who might make me an offer to sell me , of them at an unspecified price if I send him my email address.
Make quality content even more important. I do not know how? Maybe focus on natural language structure, maybe I have seen many sites that seem to manufacture content. Or very short articles that if they are not recycled content they are recycled ideas ie how many ways can you write about breaking up with your boyfriend and weight loss.
Webmaster tools are great. Give us more tools. See most people want to be squeaky clean boy scouts and will do the work to create content that is organized and of value for others, but there will be more incentive if we know we are working in the right direction or something we do is not good. For example, I use wordpress and innocently created a lot of duplicate content, with a few plugins I was testing.
Webmaster tools gave me a heads up about this so when my blog fell I could repair it. Stop putting Google stuff above the real result, I want a search engine for Web results, not for news, froogle, blogs, videos or so on. Some new business that had tons of great content but are stuck compared with old business.
Create an easy way to report pay links Spanish market need their own Matt Cutts Create a spam detection api for WordPress or make a deal with Akismet, you need to do something about spam comments. Be more accurate about splogs on wordpress. Remove directories that just copy information of YellowPages to create niche directories.
Just ask for Ask. But remember that what we really love about Google is the search engine, Google is what it is today its because the way that they were showing results to users, just remember that. Thanks everyone for weighing in on this. For example, I have a couple sites and have affiliates for them. I noticed that Google penalized me for it, but ranked the affiliate that use MY content better than me.
Obviously the pages are made to generate money froms ads. Scroll down and look at the text. Totally spamming and ranking for these keywords…. I HATE them. Then they go to a 3rd party blogging system blogger. Or maybe they use those redirecting links in emails. Or whatever else….
What can Google do about it? Notify us in Webmaster tools if you see an otherwise trustworthy site suddenly linking out to dozens or hundreds of spam sites. Anything else? What can the SEO do about it? Remove social bookmarking services from the search results, they are not delivering content and only spamming the search results often indexing higher than the sites they link to.
Reduce the impact links from countries like russia have on european or american pagerank. Poor people are forced to create them for minimal payment. You could consider to give the first found links a line or even two more text to display their content.
Let your user decide whats spam or not and with more text shown it would be easier…. With the Significant Market Power that Google enjoys it should be more accountable, transparent and involve the community more. Matt, can I send you ideas have around this? Is there a willingness within Google to improve on this difficult area?
Now, even partial urls are crawled by googlebot. Or make them all go through a directory that does a redir that is protected by robots. So what is the right answer? Anyway, some clarity here would be helpful for all of us. Sounds like a good blogpost to me. Wow, the first comment points out a site just like you asked us NOT to do.
Other commenters should re-read the post too because your talking about Webspam not Chrome for Mac and so on. In Realtor to Realtor linking was shot down by Yahoo and later by Google wherein we believe penalties existed for real estate agent websites when discovered by Google. To this day I still have competing agents with my own customers that are either actively participating with agent to agent linking or still riding out the value of all those hundreds or thousands of prohibited links that I discourage my clients time and time again to refrain from.
They themselves are often questioning if they should listen to the advice about those links being devalued or worthless because hey… the competitors are doing it or are still gaining from it! This linking strategy for us is long dead but many are still benefiting from it.
Sites that distribute Press Releases. Companies use these sites to gain link juice and push other sites down the SERPs. These sites are pretty obscure. Not many people go to them other than through search engines, mainly Google. So they are basically charging people to get listed on Google.
Most of them just live from stealing content and bother me a lot. Try to rank original sources better than aggregators. A matter of fairness…and a good algorithm. Often I will look for a niche suppliers directory or something looking for exposure and some of the figures that so called reputable websites put out just seem to be plucked from thin air.
I realise that this is as much a moral area as much as anything and dont really know how viable it is to crack down on but nevertheless I think its a disgrace. My wish: On a search result page, a domain incl. It can not be that a domain occupied the first 5 searchresults. For all of you going on about experts-exchange.
Google is indexing them because the answers do show on the page. Past what looks like a massive footer. Keep going and hey presto, there are all the answers, in plain text. They create urls and pages even for domains which they have little or no data for. What little data they have is usually wrong. I usually have to go to the second page worth of results to see anything useful.
I know that after they started doing that I stopped checking their site and then one day I did a search for the term and found it all the way at the bottom. For many mom-and-pop ecommerce sites, exchanging local and relevant links are their best shot at getting off the ground. But three-way schemes are deceptive by design.
It seems this day and age content is king — I think some people are using too many words on the page making it less relevant. Maybe some visually aesthetic points. This comment is more for algorithm purposes. I just wish everyone a good The Web has become bloated with huge directory websites that re-package links spam and non-spam links. Every other month in Google, the spam comes back and then penalizes them and then they come back, and then they are penalized.
I understand freshness, but when you see results are focused on linking, then the next week on limited content, then the next week something else — it makes it difficult for webmasters and users alike. Also, the trends seem to follow an annual calendar. Where spam is there in January — April, then penalized through June, then content prevails through September, etc…. Ok, I see what you mean.
However, this is VERY deceitful at best. There is already more than enough deceit on the Web, 1 less wont be missed. Google should drop their results until that stop trying to deceit email addresses from Google users. Lots of people work really hard to make good content… then it gets stolen and those dogs cash in on it.
Maybe something in webmaster tools? I still find that a number of sites that do not have very good content nor much original content but high page rank come up above those sites that have excellent, relevant content. I understand that content is not the only factor external links, trust, etc.
Perhaps Google should buy copyscape or develop one of their own system. All Duplicate contents including the ones where they scrap first few lines of your articles should be punished! Positive behaviours should be verifiable via webmaster central, with a small but tangible boost in search position as a reward.
The rewards and penalties do not have to be large — just not hidden — for them to have an effect on the behaviour and actions of web masters. For too long, Google has been indirectly sponsoring web spam by creating the environment where web spam can flourish.
Or to put it another way, spam targets Google because Google is the biggest. Turn the focus of webmasters away from gaining page rank or positions, to creating better web pages — by rewarding good behaviour, and punishing minor bad behaviour, with explicitly measurable rewards and penalties. Webmaster central has started to do this with things like duplicate title tag detection, but this needs to be expanded, with the consequences made more explicit.
Sam, you must be new here. Otherwise, you would have realized that your answer was far too intelligent to be understood by the masses. People can also use the Google cache to see any answer if they do what you said, of course. This works every time experts-exchange is part of a SERP. So there are not one, but three answers to the so-called experts-exchange problem. Now, is EE an authoritative resource? Should it be considered one of the premier sites on the Internet?
Absolutely not.. But it can be occasionally useful and by occasionally, I personally find it useful about once every weeks , and the data can be obtained without requiring a membership. This is a really good idea, and would be stunningly simple to implement. Easy, breezy, beautiful Cover Girl. You could even go one step further and require some form of random key generation or verification for this task specifically.
Probably outside of the scope of the Web Spam team, but it would be great to see Duplicate Content Search and Agent Rank developed and launched. I see so many instances of multiple listings for the same company, location, phone, etc. The value and importance you place on exact keyword phrase. This also makes it more difficult for legitimate companies to buy domains from domain squatters asking tons of money for these domains. Google Guidelines are indicative but can be bit vague too.
I had a travel website which was stripped of its pagerank years ago and removed from the index. It was ranking well for a lot of keywords before that. Through ignorance I must have done something wrong. I read the guidelines million times, removed anything that could have caused the problem and submitted a re-inclusion request few months after this happened.
No one from Google ever assisted me, nor could any professional help solve this issue! After an incredible 4 YEARS or bit more, since I had lost hope to be honest , my website is back on Google and ranking fairly well and this happened after …. Whether it was an automated ban or not I will never know. What I know is that Google is not transparent any many honest webmasters are wrongfully tagged and penalized.
Recently Google also suggested that our competitors can somehow get us in trouble. I ask MR. Guess that sums it all. Exclude these from the other searches. By creating these type of verticals searches could be made a lote easier. Webmaster Tools improved a lot in by the way — thank you for that. I absolutely agree with Adam. The whole process of adding and verifying a listing is shocking in my opinion.
I find it infuriating that they are mostly ebay expired auctions, out of stock items or just non existent. The other thing that bugs me is that so many people in my SERP world anyway have exact copies of their sites linking back to their primary domain name.
Google filters some of the pages but not all cache shows as primary domain and not secondary for most but not all pages. This seems to give a considerable boost to these sites ranking. In my opninion i would be so glad, if google focused ALOT more on bouncerate Or some other kinds of thing for punishing people who visits, and leave within 4 secs. There are a gazillion Made for Adsense sites that end up ripping off all legitimate users.
Instead of playing police and looking to penalize sites competing with you go after these fraudsters. I think one of the biggest issues is there is not enough reporting from google if something dodgy is found on your site. Not everybody can be experts at SEO, so if you employ a SEO person to do the work for you, its near impossible to tell if they have done something which can cause a penalty or lower rankings.
It seems google likes to be secretive on this , which is odd. I know very little about SEO, we had a website that ranked very well, but employed a SEO consultant to do some work, a few months later we lost all our page 1 ranks. Because I know very little, I then had to employ another SEO company to find out what was wrong, all of this took 6 months, and in the end we found out that the previous company had subscribed us to some sort of automatic link farm thing.
It would have been much easier if there had been an alert to this in my webmaster tools, instead of just knocking my site off the rankings without any notification. You cannot expect everybody who owns a website to be experts in SEO. Lots of sites still do that. You started cracking down on paid links than please finish it.
And mean it. Can see the same company five times, slightly different listings, in a set 10 of local results. Actually the owner might not need to get their first. If he claims it, the same filtering actions could be applied to existing copies already indexed.
It would be preemptive DMCA — but the person filing for ownership would be required to swear a strong oath that the content is really his. Oh Yeah! Matt one more simple wish. Please keep news results in Google news, or at least down to one or max 2 items. A method to eliminate or flag backlinks to your site that you do not want Google to count. Of course I realize that what I am about to say may bring the walls of the social media version of jericho crashing on my head!
I think there needs to be a great divide recognized when it comes to business inquiries in search for a product or service. I would respectfully submit that if a potential customer is looking they do not want to wade through the u tube vids, the self proclaimed blogging experts and the over all rath of canned social media entries on the subject.
If Mr. Googlebott could somehow give a choice -click here for social media listings on your query-but just give the legitimate providers the search result listings -that would be awesome. You folks have contributed to the ability of small and medium businesses to compete and survive globally and regionally-keep up the great work. The biggest problems with webspam could be eliminated by attacking their various linking schemes that usually empower their webpages. Most of the spam I encounter has little if any useful content of its own and has to be powered up externally with all kinds of different link building strategies.
If you ridded yourselves of rewarding link schemes that artificially empower mediocre or non-existent content I imagine most webspam would be pretty powerless. Wow, the knives are out in this thread. Prey no one names your website by name here. Someone might arbitrarily decide to nuke you from the google index because a few haters call it out. I echo the sentiments about experts-exchange. Also, sites like ripoffreport. Bottom line: If a website does not provide a reliable agent of service and takes such drastic steps to avoid being bound to US law, they should not rewarded with google authority in serps.
Yes, multiple sites by the same business has become common practice in a number of industries. They just think it is how you play the game — if two sites come up, you have twice as much chance to get clicked. They see their competitors doing it and think they must.
To be fair they need outreach…. Or I suppose some major penalties will get the word out fast. I think Google should look into link exchange tricks where webmasters develop websites on the same subject or the situation when they end up with one way links altough those links have been exchanged already. I have two real pet peeves about Google search results. In a global economy, any website in any country should be able to rank highly for keywords. I have purchased domain names with country-specific TLDs just to test them against.
Even when searching Google. The dot coms, dot nets, and dot orgs always outdo them. My idea is to considerate the time users spend on a particular website as one of the parametres for ranking. Used in the right way, this could help promoting websites with content, that the users find interesting and useful enough to spend time on.
This hurts the user experience for sure…that is my 1 cent :o. It would be cool if Google could limit how many actually show up on a page. They should read it and decide if that specific website is just used for spamming or not. Other sites are just posting irrelevant and repeated content for the purpose of increasing their Adsense earnings.
Google should be more keen to check whether the links that points to a specific website is natural or not, has quality or no quality, etc. Local search spam. You want to find a local restaurant with a website you can check out — but all you get on page 1 is trash directory listings. Where is the line drawn? Price comparison site spam. More or less the same as 1, but for anything that can possibly be bought.
Not on page 1 please. Oh, and also, of course, please do something about the terrible, awful, appalling webmaster site reinclusion process. I bet it would also be legal mine-field that Google will prudently NOT volunteer to walk-through. If Page contains site:. I just expanded on it. Steve: smart call, dude. Funny how many people fall into that boat too, despite the Google cache loophole being in place since about It just seems like the sites get way too much SEO juice from being large.
Is Google really incapable of identifying these sites? Just goes to show that those with Websites still see Webspam as an issue with Google. We ALL have agendas, some are just willing to admit it, while some others are sneaky and conniving about it. NO business should wear their Heart on their sleeve, like some people do. I would never trust EE with my email address due to their deciet. IF your own pages are being outranked by stolen content pages, you have bigger problems that putting the onus on Google.
Google already do a fantatic job on ranking the orginal above the stolen content. That and the fact it just too easy to abuse. In one case this year, I had the scraper credited, and later the Digg blurb replaced it, while the original content was ignored. Hello Matt. First time to comment here, although I enjoy reading your blog. With all these comments here I am not sure if this has already been mentioned, but it is what popped up in my mind while reading your post at the beginning.
I know of one guy who has a load of websites and just about every single one of them are under false names and addresses. Perhaps an alternative is to have some way of boosting websites with authenticated domain name ownership details….? Wow, too many to read to see if anyone has mentioned this.
Then, as other sites and pages are spidered, if the Googlebot finds trusted content being duplicated then the offending sites page s should be removed entirely from the index. Likewise, the newsgroups need to be indexed and ANY, and I mean ANY, site that duplicates newsgroup posts needs to be eliminated from the index.
Almost all ask that participants create a page with a topic that relates to their homepage then have them link back with very popular targeted keywords. This is a problem that google should address before it gets out of control. Google should consider a testing area to enable webmasters to scan for possible infringements, not a scan that would give a score but guidance.
It could report about lack of sitemap, meta tags and html errors. It could also warn the person if the site has possible infringements such as cloaked or stuffed words informing people to consider the actions if they continue. Maybe the scan could also help towards the spiders work? I know hundreds of small business owners who do not have a clue about proper site design, having this in webmaster tools would be a good start to improve the content of the Google experience.
For companies like us we want to see better quality websites out there, education is the key and warnings would aid this. While me and my company follow and respect the guidelines, I still see the same sites year after year we compete against rewarded for blatantly violating them One Personal injury firm who have been 1 in Boston for years has thousands of inbound links from a college in NewYork? Also I forgot to say that if a site had violated any rules a cease and desist warning should be emailed to the webmaster giving them 7 days to alter the site.
You do not have to make the ekstra filtering serverside, you can let the plugin do it in the browser. AVG Internet Security has a browser plugin that checks all links that appear in Google searchresults. If any of the links have been reported or is suspected to be harmfull, I am warned by AVG.
I appreciate this plugin and I do not experience any delays when I search using Google. Collect the block-data and tell webmasters in Google Webmaster Tools how many users dislike their website. However, it is important that users have to decide themselve and actively have to choose themselves if they want to use this feature, and if they want to use other users lists of blocked websites.
Not all webmasters know if they are doing something that is against Googles guidelines, why not warn them and give them a chance to fix it. Today a webmaster can prevent an entire page from being indexed using a filter in a robots. Why not allow them to prevent an area on a page to be indexed.
Thus I suggest Google to support a tag. Rank sites that use keyword stuffing lower. The websites I work so hard on get scraped by spammers all the time. These scrapers make it look like I have duplicate pages everywhere. Getting a new site onto DMOZ is so arbitrary and nearly impossible to investigate. If a category does not have an editor you may be out of luck. I agree with Spamhound and Rosenstand. I want an option on the search results so that I can click something that says this was relevant to my search or this was not relevant to my search and then the webspam team could go in and look at the results and act on them.
That is to say more relevant better targeted search results as Google set out to do by becoming the best SE in the first place. I still find search results are often a load of old crud that are not really the sort of quality I would like to see and are too easily manipulated by clever little tricks and by those who do not care about the end user. I would like to see the very best search engine results that are of the utmost relevance and best quality possible.
I was thinking about this recently and think I may have come up with a simple solution! Now I say simple the idea is pretty simple but as someone who is only really into SEO and trying very hard to help provide the best search results, for me it is not so simple RE the coding and programing that would likely be involved but the idea I have would I think almost certainly help to improve the end user experience as well as create more stickiness for a search engine so people would tend to use it more above others.
So — an improvement in the results of searches is what I would like to see much in line with Googles original philosophy. So may be Google could, if not able to force other sites to do such a thing, perhaps Google could start a site that identifies those that are real so users of such sites would know when things are official or when things are either scams or impersonators. I see poor quality sites ranking higher than quality sites on major target keywords.
I think Google needs to improve and take into account the track record of a site, looking at true authority in a lot more detail and pay less attention to things that can be easily influenced, such as the practice of using one word in a title to gain weight, anchor text on account of a site conveniently having the main keyword in their site name. Things like this mean crappy sites can rank higher than an established site of over 8 years! You need to try and address things like this. Blogs etc are even worse as they are free.
Thus, they ARE disposable. The problems for SE, in regards to Webspam will only get worse and likely at a disproportional rate to normal Web growth. The autobot-spam robots—even the human-mediated ones—use virtually identical text with identical links. As soon as you spot that the text is a block of repeated text-with-links on a forum or blog, discount every link down preferably to nothing. As soon as the spammers realise that they are paying for no result, they will stop, and guys—like me—with forums or blogs will breathe a sigh of relief, since we will be able to spend our time on new content, rather than wiping the filth off our forums all the time.
Some of the most annoying spam right now if major authority sites building a single page on everything they can think of and then pushing internal links at that page. This results in a very bad user experience. Searches get presented with a page from one of the major newspapers or something like that, which is useless and way below that on the front page are great results written by people who care. And yes I think a lot of wikipedia falls into this also.
Lets be serious Matt Google is in bed with all the large publishers — which will mean at some point in the future another company will start to produce better search results if it keeps going the way it is now. Disclosure: The website I work for has been listed dozens of times by major national newspapers as a source of information.
Newspapers have referenced the site with quotes like:. Dave originial is onto something: spammed results are more likely to use low and no-cost link sources. Perhaps it would be useful to look at the percentage of inbound links coming from free sources like blogs and forums, versus those links that come from high-cost domains which may be more likely to be editorial. It would be worth researching, anyway. This suggestion might be for the web spam team or the Product Search team assuming such a team exists.
One thing I run into all the time is Product Search results that list an item at a very low price, but after you go to the product page, you see that the product is:. I imagine most of these occurrences are unintentional, but I do see the potential for abuse. Then, of course, the site completes the bait-and-switch by offering you some alternative product.
So suddenly there was a huge demand for based coolers, and only a couple of manufacturers had a product on the market at that time. I selected a highly-rated according to Product Search retail site, which actually claimed to have 3 of the coolers in stock. I placed the order through Google Checkout, but then afterward… I was informed that the item was out of stock.
I placed my order on November 21, The item shipped on January 9, and is estimated to arrive on January 15th! This inexplicable change has delivered a massive blow to the usability of Product Search. How about wiping out the s of spam directories that iEntry use to entice people to cough up an email address for submission so they can do some real spamming? Maybe you should learn to be civil, rather than trying to score cheap points. Often I search for a technical problem, like a PHP error, and some of the top results look like they have my answer, but the actual page has no info, just a request to sign up so I can reveal the answer.
I would suggest that Google include an icon to represent harmful sites that can get users hacked. Google bots would need to gather more information and the algorith should be able to track such links on the site wisely.
This could have webmasters of such sites reverting to Google for such action, so it should all be justified. More explicit information from Google webmaster tools would help enormously. People using this paid service should receive a reply telling them what they need to do to remove the penalty. Local search results spam — this is getting rediculous — it also must be stuffing googles DB with loads of fake addresses etc, which will eventually make the data useless.
Blogspot is a huge spam fest — making it harder to spam would be wonderful. Also, on the other end of the scale, continuing to improve notification for when people are hacked etc and end up spamming unintentionally. Also — continuing to reduce ability to place Google Ads on spam sites — still quite a bit of MFA cruft out there. Map spam and spam in other relatively new product areas such as video is something to try and get on top of early on.
MFA sites. Act on reports of sites that use multiple domains pointing to a main domain for the purpose of hogging the serps. Find a way to de-rank scraper sites. It is way to easy to do so now despite what Google says. Thom, please keep in mind that there is no origin source for newsgroup postings. I guess that Google is not allowed to take Google Groups as only source for newsgroup postings into SERPs because of their monopoly position.
Transparency, transparency, transparency on penalties in WMT and action on collateral damage to give some comeback for sites. I would pay for such a service. A guy who was hosting on our servers www. Maybe common dns or IP, I am not sure but google got us down as a bad neighborhood. I feel really bad for him because he was punished for our stupid linking. We had other sites that had good sites taken out as collateral damage. I have done a reconsideration for them but that part of Google needs some work too.
How about charging to cover costs? The worst part of the ban on our sites is the whole thing is in limbo. What do you do? Make a new site because the old one is dead. Wait for the old one to come back? I suggest a system something like the following in WMT.
You have a category one penalty. Possibly for doing X. No explanation required. Lots of bloggers seem to be encouraging their twitter followers to spam their followers with the exact same tweet in order to enter a competition and have their link promoted. Try to call out and dis-credit sites that are buying blogs posts with nofollow.
These blogs usually show an ad or offer to buy a post on their site and the posts read very unnatural. Should be and easy pick-off! Scrapping sites that do not link back to the original content should be easy to pick off and eliminate. Just because a domain is older does not necessarily make its content more relevant to the query search. It seems there is a leniency to older domain that violate basic google guidelines. Thanks for the continuing suggestions, everyone. After the first or so comments I spent a few hours putting the suggestions into very rough categories.
In the interest of transparency, here are my rough tallies from that point. More transparency, esp. Provide mechanisms for interaction Graham Davies wants to send suggestions. Link exchanges: 7 esp. Spam detection API, a la Akismet: 4 Ability to report spam comments and the destination urls Partner with Akismet to do better spam detection: 1. Multiple sites by the same owner: 3 [acura water pump] [rachat credit] greatbluewidgets.
MFA-ish sites, esp. Webmaster guidelines as a PDF or ebook: 2 Write a rule book to go into more detail, e. Let us know if you set up a submission process. I have a few companies i would like to send your way! Thank you for the summary, Matt. This is apparently a hot issue, just as it should be. I think you and your team are doing a great job. I am a reputable SEO, or at least fancy myself that way. A couple things I have noticed about my maturing in my job over the past ten years is that, although PageRank is important obviously hugely important , I do not look at the number as a measure.
I do not normally see instances where scraping will out-rank the original content, but if it is being seen widely, I would have to agree with the concern as follows:. If I write and properly prepare content that people want, the important part of my job is done. Based on this, I would have to agree with the part as follows:.
However, if the reputation was earned and doled out correctly, it could make an interesting study. I have a feeling this might be one of the top posts of , and so early into the year The hard things is finding a consesus, because depending on your viewpoint some things are larger protities than others. As a blogger, nothing kills me more than finding my content stolen, or rewritten in a random way. Another of my concerns are harmful sites which download things as soon as I visit.
I do report them when I can. I thought about this a while and I think Google should add a button to the Google Toolbar where sites can be reported with a click like Stunbleupon. Actually I have a homemade custom version for myself, but something more robust I think would be a good idea…. There are some article directories including mine that has invested a lot in providing quality content to our visitors through hiring in-house creative content writers. For me, instead of writing off article directories all together, pages should be ranked on page per basis by Google as it does this very nicely right now.
Hi Matt, Since you singled my names out with the ranking all over the world but not the USA, I wanted to know if you had any suggestions about where we could find answers or submit the URL for some sort of feedback.
Thanks Olivier. What most gets my back up about this whole this is that we have always tried to give the minimum required info on any web-page i. If you look closely at this meaning ful content then the keyword stuffing really comes into effect. This will be based on the questions we get asked by our customers.
So in this context I think they are valuable. Greater transparency would be a great bonus. MediaWiki changed so this works on all sites using wiki software. Quick ideas from top of my head include a meta tag or similar included on all pages using this or a list somewhere. Social media — this issue is a difficult one, most people said the same about blogs when they came out why can people write about their cats and get ranked highly — blogs eventually matured into a key part of the web — like blogs, social media sites are just websites, and reflect a change in then nature of the web, and are maturing also.
They too will likely be made invaluable. I see people asked for Chrome for Mac but no-one has asked for Chrome for Linux shame on you all! The results are vastly different when you enter something in singular format, versus plural. More search based off real english root words I guess. If I look up cabinet, show me cabinet, cabinets, cabinetry etc. Which brings me to the type ahead suggested results — it is very frustrating again with the singular and plural differences to be optimized for say singular, because adwords and keyword tools show this has a far greater search volume usually yet the type ahead tends to display the plural version!
Why not auto suggest the result with the greatest search volume. Most search engines have this same problem. It baffles me. Now as for synonyms, it would be great if there was a synonym index someplace to help people with their searches, or if it was a part of the auto suggest feature or just even available at the search box level. Say I type in the word transmitter, I would like google to suggest to me that synonyms for this word is also sensor, and transducer…or else return the results that have all three.
I know that is a lot to ask because you get into trouble with the english language — say cream is a synonym for lotion, but cream is also a heavy form of milk used in cooking…when I am researching something I find I manually have to check synonym forms to make sure I am getting everything.
Lastly, some form of web page archival would be beneficial. I have used the bet labs gtimeline feature to filter for timely results — and it has its problems, but I still run into so many sites with completely out-dated data, or irrelevant data. Who needs the pre-poll results from elections 8 years ago? I would like to ability to mark something as outdated. Then maybe if google sees enough people marking pages as outdated maybe the pages could got into an archive or something….
I am so sick of seeing the wiki results at the top, and other crap results that I would like to remove them and never see them again. Never show me this stupid netflix popup ad ever ever again. But alas google is so miles and miles ahead of the other search engines. I love google. I can not imagine my life without google. They contain absolutely no content and are, in most cases, just a way for people to display website URLs that they are trying to sell. Whilst its a free market, it wrong for anyone to grab all the popular.
But for the problems that do exist, you guys have continued to evolve and are still light years ahead of everyone else in that regard. And at least someone out there is listening multiple someones when guys like Lasnik and Brian White are brought into play. Overall I think you do a good job in eliminating spam. But I would like to call your attention to one problem with the search results. This is the huge number of high-ranking Youtube videos which contain no relevant information about the search topic.
These often occur in pairs on the first page top 10 of the search results. Some of them appear to highly ranked merely on the basis of their title, because their content is totally different from what the title implies. It is obvious that no one at Google checks these videos to see what is really on them. You may not consider this to be spam. But whatever you call it, ranking these videos so high is a serious flaw in yoursearch results. Thank you. Theres some sites i reported long time ago and they still show up ranking high with no content at all.
Empty review pages that Google ranks above non-empty review pages are not Webspam. They highlight a flaw in Google algo. Having had some time to think about this 1 the biggest and worst web spam there is comes from blogger splogs. Google, hold the torch to your own feet. Pick up your SEO game, clean up your crap if you care so much. Not spam, but certainly placed inappropriately in the index probably, since enough people are mad about them here.
Same with aboutus. Frankly I suspect many people writing here are simply doing more and more advanced, niche like searches and the algo fails them at their level of search engine query. Sometimes I end up getting outline view numbering of reports, which is totally irrelevant.
They claim on their site that no post true or false will be taken down, no matter the case. ROR and CB have a good concept but the news should be validated so it has some kind of credit. I am personally sick of getting calls from small business asking me to get rid of ROR because they rank for their company name.
I understand you make your money with AdWords, but basicly you are screwing not only other advertisers, but also you search users. You Google that is flagged my website and I must say it looks like a false positive you did also remove it immediately when I reported it to you… And I am quite happy with the speed of that, thanks!
Or does it seem like a false positive flagging all my downloads? Well, who knows because there is noone I can contact to get more in-depth information? Since you flagged it, you must have it? How about creating some kind of blacklist or a whitelist and then let google users vote for the ones they really think are spam and the ones that may be usefull, in that way you have free human review of every spam page.
The only problem I found is that spammers will have some sort of exposure at first, but if voting is realtime, lets imagine that with 10 votes the page disappears from the search engines and permanently blacklisted for mails or something of a sort. I know my idea is not that original, but I think the original part is integrating real users human instead of bots in this issue, maybe by a new type of social webpage.
There are two spam practices that really bother me which I would like to see handled more forcefully:. The practice of creating a bunch of small websites in an attempt to get more positions on one keyword or to use the links the small websites bring to boost another website.
This includes creating blogs on separate addresses to capture two positions on the same keyword. Writing a blog post and getting it put up on several different blogs, usually with similar words, not to get the site indexed, but to get the link back counted. This is exactly the sort of zombie state that Google should address so at least he can definitively know one way or the other. I do not know what he did and maybe he deserved it but just not knowing if it will come back or not is cruel after 5 years of working on something.
Would appreciate it MR MC if you could look at the site I posted 15 posts back as an example of collateral damage. He hosted on our servers and got zapped because we were buying dumb polish spam network links. We have several issues on Google Search 1. Google Local Results 1, 3 or 10 Result on Search a. Dominating Google Organic Results b. Spam complaints are not rectified shortly b. Old snippet issue, no consideration while we raised the complaint through Webmaster Account c.
Keyword Stuff and Repetition a. Most of the competitor site adding keywords to page header in gray color and small size font for visible, but actually they used CSS to control the size of the fonts and everything b. CSS tricks to hiding text.
My wish is to address a routine complaint I get from my AdWords customers. Please add 1 an option to send an email when your credit card is billed, 2 an option to email a weekly, monthly, billing report in PDF, excell, etc.
How can this been removed from Google? We have always been white hat seo. I noticed we have lost a lot of ranking related to our competitors. I asked an SEO consultant who was a friend to see if he could figure out anything I could not.
He came back and said we are getting killed by the paid text links. He has never recommended to anyone to go that route but had never seen anything like what he did in our area. For those of us trying to work within the rules, either there has to be some improvement in punishing those with paid links or some other option to level the playing field.
The biggest problem in my opinion are the webmasters with the deepest pockets that keep buying, buying, buying links. They are so easy to detect. They simply target one keyword at a time and these links are always in the footer of the bought pages. I know two perfect examples that have bought to date 1,, links and , respectively.
It should be easy for google to begin scanning for links en masse that simply contain one keyword. Especially when the recurrence of those keywords are prevalent. Obviously sites are not linking naturally to each other using a method like that. A more stringent process is needed for local. A search for companies like mine in my city lists a few businesses that have no physical address here and are nothing to do with the local market.
One SEO company has done this for cities throughout the UK, despite only having an office in one city. But there are so many aggregators, planets, notebooks et caetera even legitimate ones … I am looking for some term, and first replies are all the same quotes from the same feed and original is somewhere deep on 2nd or 3rd page.
And smaller maybe local irritation: last year quite a lot of fake forums appeared at least here in Poland. Spammers grab old usenet content and publish it as the forum. And this forum suddenly ranks fairly well while original usenet archives are somewhere deeeeeep. A quality brand or approval. A lot on the web is of a poor quality.
It would be nice to see some sort of approval of quality system like most physical products have like the Michelin stars for restaurants. According to me the biggest problem with webspam is currently the way Google you? What we have been accused of was something not intentional due to a bug in the code, following some major changes introduced in the site. But, this is not the point. The problem is that it was impossible to make sense out of that mail message.
Who, on earth, can tell when those 30 days are starting and ending, after reading a phrase like that? Which pages? All of them? Some of them? The old ones? You can remove from a certain place only something that is already there. Well, not at all. Pages indexed in the past are still there, but no new pages are visible.
The whole domain is affected. In democratic societies, responsibility is individual. Then, an invitation follows to submit the site for reconsideration. We did it, but we received noreply. What do we have to expect? Has the site been already reconsidered? Complete darkness. From one day to the other your income is drastically reduced. Google determines the behavior of Internet users.
This is a fact. But occupying a dominant position means not only benefits and advantages, it means also to have responsibilities towards the society as a whole. Google should act according to clear rules and should inform site owners of what is going on. As of now, one is condemned without a trial to a sentence of indefinite duration, with no possibility of defense.
What I would like from google not directly SERP related : — Informations : Thanks to your guidelines we webmasters already have some useful informations about what not to do ; but every time we make a modification to one of our sites we fear loosing rank because we would have made something that google does not like.
So please keep up giving us updated informations about what not to do. What I would like to see removed from SERP : — cost-comparison sites : They often trust the first places and bring no real content.
Good move. At first glance the software can seem quite expensive, but you will quickly realise that you can pay for the monthly fee within a few days, and the rest is pure profit for you. But which is the best arbitrage betting software in ? As you hopefully know by now, arbitrage betting opportunities occur when the odds provided by bookmakers for a particular match satisfy a very specific set of conditions. If you can find high enough odds that allow you to bet on all possible outcomes of a sporting event and profit regardless of the result, you have found an arbitrage bet.
The thing is, these arbitrage betting opportunities are not that common. You could spend hours trawling through the odds for various matches with various bookmakers and maybe only find a handful of arbitrage bets. Arbitrage betting software aka surebet software scans the odds for tens if not hundreds of bookmakers for many, many sports, tournaments and matches. The software typically has an integrated calculator that will let you know how much to bet on each side, with options for rounding or biasing your stakes.
You simply click on the bet button, and the software will load up the relevant pages for that event on the bookmaker sites. You simply confirm the stake for each site and place the bet. The more bets you place, the more you will profit. Surebet software essentially allows you to spend much less time on the boring part searching for arbs , and more time on the profitable part placing bets!
Here are the most important things to look out for when choosing the best sports arbitrage betting software for you! Some arb finders cover as few as 5 sports, while others cover as many as 35! No prizes for guessing which one produces more arbs for their customers…. This is an important one. More bookmakers means more arbs, more profitable arbs more likely to find better odds with more bookmakers but most importantly, more options for you to sign up to if and when your accounts eventually start getting limited.
Many arbitrage bets disappear within a few minutes of being discovered by the software packages. This means that it is imperative that you are getting access to the arbitrage betting opportunities as they are being discovered. The arbitrage software should include a built in betting calculator that automatically calculates the necessary stakes for each leg of the arbitrage bet to ensure that you lock in the profit.
Ideally, they should include options for rounding your stakes to avoid suspicion with the bookmakers as well as biasing your stakes to favour a particular outcome that you believe has value. A good arbitrage betting software will include middles negative and even Polish as well as cross-market arbitrage bets. These advanced arb types tend to last longer and be less easily detected by the bookmakers than standard arbs, so I highly recommend that you get software that can find them.
As we have discussed many times, having your accounts limited or closed is one of the greatest risks for an arbitrage bettor. Some arbitrage betting software now have features to hide your arbitrage activity. This can include separate dedicated web browsers only for betting to stop the bookmakers tracking you via social media and other trackers as well as automatic cookie and cache clearing at the start and end of each betting session.
Having these features will again prolong your career as an arbitrage bettor, so they are definitely worthwhile having. BetSlayer UK Only. OddsMonkey UK Only. Find out how you can redeem your discount on my RebelBetting discount page! Essentially, I recommend RebelBetting if you are serious about sports arbitrage betting. They are reasonably expensive, but they are packed with the most features and offer a reliable, fast desktop application. The user interface is excellent and comparing the odds between bookmakers is a breeze.
It is very easy to see which order you should place your bets in. They cover 90 bookmakers and 10 sports and they offer middles as well as standard arbs. The desktop app uses a separate, dedicated browser for betting and it can clear cookies automatically if you desire. However, it does come with quite a hefty price tag this can be reduced by using the coupon. If you are planning on just doing some occasional arbing, I recommend that you go with the BetOnValue silver package.
The only difference is that there is a 3 minute delay on the feed of arbitrage bets. For casual arbers, this won't be such a big deal. The other benefit of going with BetOnValue is that you get access to live arbitrage bets, as well as their value bet feed, in case you are interested in doing live arbing or value betting in the future.
Read more about value betting here. Otherwise, I recommend looking at BetOnValue! RebelBetting has been a stalwart of the sports arbitrage betting scene for many, many years now. They are widely considered to be the market leader when it comes to arbitrage betting software. Note: RebelBetting does not have a native Mac compatible version. To run on Mac, you must download a separate program that allows you to run a virtual PC. Alternatively, you must use Bootcamp.
For more info, check out this page:. The arbitrage bets that match your filters are displayed in the main part of the screen. The profit margin, match participants, bet type and odds are all displayed in a simple, easy to understand fashion.
I like this because arbitrage betting often requires you to make a number of bets at high stakes in quick succession. A complicated layout can increase the chance of making a mistake under pressure. This will display the bookmakers that are accepting bets for that particular outcome and which match the filters you have set. This helps greatly when determining which order you should place your bets in.
It lets you know what your backup options are if the odds change suddenly, or if your bet is rejected. As expected, there is a decent built-in arbitrage calculator that allows you to bias your stakes to favour a particular outcome, or round your stakes to avoid bookmaker suspicion. RebelBetting has around 90 bookmakers, the highest of any of the major arbitrage betting software packages.
Unfortunately, it only scans for arbs on 10 sports, which is a little disappointing. You will slightly find fewer arbs with RebelBetting than with other services, largely because they do not cover as many sports. You can filter arbs by profit margin, bookmaker and type. The software also gives you an estimate of the arb reliability, which is essentially an indicator of the likelihood that one of the bookmakers will void your bet due to palpable error or similar.
RebelBetting also allows you to place your bets directly from their software, which acts as its own web browser. This keeps all of your betting activity separate from your web browsing, which prevents the bookmakers from tracking you with cookies. There is also the ability to bet through a proxy, to further disguise your activity.
These are excellent defensive arbing features. Overall, RebelBetting has put together an excellent arbitrage betting software package. It has a very clean, uncluttered interface, but is packed with all of the necessary features for serious arbing. RebelBetting have generously agreed to offer a 2 for 1 discount on their arbitrage and value betting software for readers of The Arb Academy! I recommend that you choose your subscription based on how long you plan on doing arbitrage betting for.
You can cancel your subscription at any time and you will retain access to the service until the end of your current billing period. Want more info? Check out the full RebelBetting review! BetOnValue has been around for a couple of decades now and is still a major name in sports arbitrage betting. It is quite an advanced piece of software, but it isn't quite as user friendly as some of the other software I have reviewed in this article.
The first time you load up the BetOnValue software, you will no doubt be quite confused as to how it works. The interface is quite crowded with information. Once you spend some time playing around with it, you will figure out how it works and you will realise that it actually has quite a number of advanced features that the other software reviewed in this article don't have. I was pleasantly surprised by the number of arbitrage bets available; many more than I had seen with the other arbitrage software.
BetOnValue cover a large number of sports about 32 , so they are able to serve up many more arbitrage opportunities. Upon clicking on a potential arb, you are taken to another screen which summarises all of the bookmaker odds for that match. It is quite neatly displayed, and sortable for each outcome, which is very helpful for figuring out your backup bets.
I was quite impressed by this. Clicking on specific bookmaker odds brings up a small graph that gives you the history for those odds. You can get a feel for whether the odds are trending up, down, are volatile, or relatively flat. The more you explore the BetOnValue software, the more features you realise it has. Nevertheless, I do like the way they present the odds for each event; it makes it easy to tell at a glance whether it is safe to go after an arbitrage bet or not.
You could do worse than choose BetOnValue as your arbitrage betting software. They have a large number of bookmakers and sports to choose from. However, their software is not very beginner friendly, and you will need to spend some time playing around with it before you figure out how everything works. BetOnValue offer a unique pricing model whereby you can get access to the software cheaper by agreeing to a longer delay on the arb feed. The longer the delay, the more likely you are to be seeing false, expired arbs, which can waste your time.
For most people, I recommend going with the gold package to ensure that you are getting live access to the arbitrage bet feed. Many arbitrage bets disappear within minutes of being discovered, so speed is crucial. However, if you are arbing on a budget or just placing the occasional arbitrage bet, consider the silver package. It is much cheaper with just a 3 minute delay on the arb feed. BetBurger was founded in , making it a relative newcomer to the sports arbitrage betting scene, but it has quickly established itself as a major competitor.
Potential arbitrage bets are displayed in the left half of the screen, and once you click on an arb, the details will be displayed in the panel on the right half of the screen. You can see an integrated arbitrage betting calculator, as well as all the possible arbitrage opportunities for that match. It will show all the various bookmaker combinations, sorted by highest profit margin by default. Rather than listing the various outcomes and the associated odds for each bookmaker, they try to list every possible combination of bookmakers that results in an arbitrage betting opportunity.
I find that this makes it difficult to know which order to place your bets in. You are much more likely to make costly errors with this software than the other options out there. I find this unacceptable when you consider the high monthly price they demand. BetBurger allows for filtering by bookmaker, match location good for defensive arbing , arb types, outcome types money line, asian handicap etc. Live arbing is an advanced strategy with higher risk but also higher potential reward, so I recommend that you stick with the prematch plan if you are still starting out.
I was pleasantly surprised by the number of sure bets available; many more than I had seen with the other arbitrage software. BetOnValue cover a large number of sports about 32 , so they are able to serve up many more arbitrage opportunities.
Upon clicking on a potential arb, you are taken to another screen which summarises all of the bookmaker odds for that match. It is quite neatly displayed, and sortable for each outcome, which is very helpful for figuring out your backup bets. I was quite impressed by this. Clicking on specific bookmaker odds brings up a small graph that gives you the history for those odds. You can get a feel for whether the odds are trending up, down, are volatile, or relatively flat.
The more you explore the BetOnValue software, the more arbitrage betting features you realise it has. Nevertheless, I do like the way they present the odds for each event; it makes it easy to tell at a glance whether it is safe to go after a sure bet or not. You could do worse than choose BetOnValue as your free arbitrage software. There is no limit on the length of their free trial and they have a large number of bookmakers and sports to choose from.
However, their software loads quite slowly and the 20 minute delay on the arb feed means that you are missing out on plenty of arbitrage betting opportunities. BetBurger was founded in , making it a relative newcomer to the sports arbitrage betting scene, but it has quickly established itself as a major competitor. Free arb bets are displayed in the left half of the screen, and once you click on an arb, the details will be displayed in the panel on the right half of the screen.
You can see an integrated arbitrage calculator, as well as all the possible arbitrage opportunities for that match. It will show all the various bookmaker combinations, sorted by highest profit margin by default. Rather than listing the various outcomes and the associated odds for each bookmaker, they try to list every possible combination of bookmakers that results in an arbitrage betting opportunity.
I find that this makes it difficult to know which order to place your bets in. BetBurger allows for filtering by bookmaker, match location good for defensive arbing , arb types, outcome types money line, asian handicap etc. Unfortunately, it doesn't save your filters unless you sign up for a free account, so I recommend you do that to save you from adjusting the filters every time you open their software.
The major downside is the 15 minute delay on the arb feed which is quite long. However, as long as you adjust your filters to show stable arbs that have been around for a few hours, you will still be able to find some gems in the rough. Personally, I don't really recommend the BetBurger service. The interface is quite poor and confusing, especially for beginners. Their customer service is also very poor.
Despite these flaws, you will find that they are one of the most expensive services out there if you do end up upgrading to a premium subscription. To get the most out of it, you really need to get an account so that you can customise and save your filters. Otherwise, the filters will be reset each time you load up the webpage. Betslayer was started in and has relatively quickly risen to become one of the top tier arbing software packages available.
Looking at the pros and cons above, it is clear that Betslayer has gone with a different approach to the other software providers. They are offering close to a full version of their software, but for a period of 7 days only. Opening up BetSlayer, you are greeted with a relatively clean interface. Much like BetBurger, the potential arbs are displayed along the left and the selected arb details displayed on the right.
The thing that struck me the most using this software was how few arbs there were. This is not surprising when you consider that Betslayer only covers 28 bookmakers, however. They counteract this by having virtually no restrictions on the arbs available in their free version. In the arb details panel, you can see the odds available at the various bookmakers by clicking on a dropdown menu.
In the arb details panel, there is a built-in arbitrage betting calculator with the ability to round stakes, as well as save the bet into the Betslayer profit tracker, which can be used to track your progress over time. There is also the ability to enable live arbs, although this is recommended for experienced arbitrage bettors only.
The BetSlayer arbing software is pretty light on features on the whole, but otherwise a decent enough option. The 7 day limit will not appeal to those who plan on using the free software for a long time, but for those who are planning on upgrading eventually, 7 days is more than enough time to decide if you like it or not. OddsMonkey is a site that focuses predominantly on matched betting rather than arbitrage betting, but their OddsMatcher tool can be used to find arbitrage opportunities, so I have included it here.
The OddsMatcher was primarily developed to help punters interested in doing some matched betting taking advantage of sign up bonuses , but it can double as an arb hunting service as well. When you open the OddsMatcher, you will see a nice user interface that clearly shows each arb on a new row with the match details, arb rating, bookmaker and corresponding exchange prices. However, in the OddsMatcher, the arb rating refers to how much of your stake will be returned.
So on the surface, it seems like we have the ideal free arbitrage bet finder! Unlimited free trial period, no delay on the arb feed and no limit on the profit margin per arb with a clean, easy to understand interface to boot! Well, the major downside of the OddsMatcher is that it includes a paltry 3 bookmakers only Coral, Betfred and Skybet , plus the exchanges. Just one!
If you are thinking of purchasing an OddsMonkey subscription anyway, definitely give the free trial a go to make sure that it is right for you! It has the full functionality of the premium version, just with a 0. I like the clean interface, the ease with which you can compare the bookmaker odds, the integrated arbitrage calculator and the extra features arb reliability indicator, bookmaker password encryption. The ability to arb in an entirely separate web browser with cookies deleted at the start and end of each session makes absolute sense to me from a defensive arbing standpoint.
I recommend that you download it and give it a try. If you are planning on arbing heavily, you really need to upgrade to the paid tools so that you can get the real time, live feed of arbitrage betting opportunities, as well as unrestricted access to the high profit margin arbs, which can really boost your profits. The most comprehensive, in-depth training on profitable sports betting available.
Start earning an income online using the unique techniques in this free course. Any particular interests? Check the boxes below before signing up! Disclaimer: This post may contain affiliate links. I will earn a commission if you choose to purchase a product or service after clicking on my link.
This helps pay for the cost of running the website. You will not be disadvantaged in any way by using my links. I'm an Australian guy who has used profitable sports betting to provide a decent side income over a thousand dollars per month!
I've set up the The Arb Academy to teach others how to do the same and achieve financial security through a second income stream! Please log in again. The login page will open in a new tab. After logging in you can close it and return to this page.
Quick Navigation. What is the Purpose of Arbitrage Software? Summary - Free Arbitrage Software. A 15 or 20 minute delay on the arb feed is quite common. Free Trial Period. Time Delay. Trial Length. But, how does their free version stack up? The RebelBetting interface is very clean and uncrowded. This is an excellent feature. Download the RebelBetting software for free via their website link below :. Use the button below to find out how you can redeem your discount!
It operates entirely in browser, with no software download required. You can also bring up a graph of the best odds for the match over the last 12 hours. Interested in giving them a shot? Access their free surebet software via the link below! Arbs can be sorted by profit margin, age, time to match start and more.
You can sign up for a free account via the button below no credit card required. Much like BetBurger, it operates entirely in a browser without any software to download.
The profit margin, match participants, bet type free arbitrage betting alertsite odds are just leave the bookmaker names, but the software still seemed. Overall, RebelBetting has put together making it a relative newcomer advantages are the low price or that reason, did not. Clicking on specific bookmaker odds reviews and my own analysis that particular outcome and which for those odds. To work out whether you have an arbitrage opportunity, we use an arbitrage calculator, which match the filters you have. RebelBetting has around 90 bookmakers, few buttons. The sure bets that match the best arbing software. Why it is so, what is dev. One of the players has it was later rebranded into. You will be able to give a short overview of which is very helpful for quite a downside. The reviews are always positive, of the rest, telling you package and they offer it stakes to favour a particular out on plenty of arbitrage.Is fx-arbing alert site exist? It is imposible to make triangular forex arb because all the big banks are doing this. Free arbitrage bets. SUREBETS- arbitrage on sport bets, total profit mBTC. If you have any questions feel free to ask. You will need to use surebet calculator Did you find any arbitrage alert site or any other strategy? Keep us informed. Finally, a simple stock alert app that requires no sign up, is free and no ads! KR1 (unlike arb) is not a miner, they are focused on investing in Because Bitcoin's ultimately a bet on price while investing in blockchain is a bet on innovation!